Enable javascript in your browser for better experience. Need to know to enable it? Go here.
本页面中的信息并不完全以您的首选语言展示,我们正在完善其他语言版本。想要以您的首选语言了解相关信息,可以点击这里下载PDF。
更新于 : Apr 24, 2019
不在本期内容中
这一条目不在当前版本的技术雷达中。如果它出现在最近几期中,那么它很有可能仍然具有相关参考价值。如果这一条目出现在更早的雷达中,那么它很有可能已经不再具有相关性,我们的评估将不再适用于当下。很遗憾我们没有足够的带宽来持续评估以往的雷达内容。 了解更多
Apr 2019
采纳 ? 我们强烈建议业界采用这些技术,我们将会在任何合适的项目中使用它们。

We put polyglot programming on Trial in one of our first Radars to suggest that choosing the right language for the job could significantly boost productivity, and there were new language entrants that were worthy of consideration. We want to reraise this suggestion because we're seeing a new push to standardize language stacks by both developers and enterprises. While we acknowledge that placing no restrictions on language uses can create more problems than it solves, promoting a few languages that support different ecosystems or language features is important for both enterprises to accelerate processes and go live more quickly and developers to have the right tools to solve the problem at hand.

Aug 2010
试验 ? 值得一试。了解为何要构建这一能力是很重要的。企业应当在风险可控的前提下在项目中尝试应用此项技术。
This technique was included in this edition of the Radar for visibility. We felt that there wasn't anything substantial to add to the discourse around it, but that it was important to keep this in view.
Apr 2010
试验 ? 值得一试。了解为何要构建这一能力是很重要的。企业应当在风险可控的前提下在项目中尝试应用此项技术。
This technique was included in this edition of the Radar for visibility. We felt that there wasn't anything substantial to add to the discourse around it, but that it was important to keep this in view.
发布于 : Apr 29, 2010

下载第27期技术雷达

English | Español | Português | 中文

获取最新技术洞见

 

立即订阅

查看存档并阅读往期内容