Enable javascript in your browser for better experience. Need to know to enable it? Go here.
更新于 : Nov 14, 2018
不在本期内容中
这一条目不在当前版本的技术雷达中。如果它出现在最近几期中,那么它很有可能仍然具有相关参考价值。如果这一条目出现在更早的雷达中,那么它很有可能已经不再具有相关性,我们的评估将不再适用于当下。很遗憾我们没有足够的带宽来持续评估以往的雷达内容。 了解更多
Nov 2018
试验 ? 值得一试。了解为何要构建这一能力是很重要的。企业应当在风险可控的前提下在项目中尝试应用此项技术。

Although we've had mostly new blips in this edition of the Radar, we think it's worth continuing to call out the usefulness of Security Chaos Engineering. We've moved it to Trial because the teams using this technique are confident that the security policies they have in place are robust enough to handle common security failure modes. Still, proceed with caution when using this technique—we don't want our teams to become desensitized to these issues.

May 2018
评估 ? 在了解它将对你的企业产生什么影响的前提下值得探索

We’ve previously talked about the technique of Chaos Engineering in the Radar and the Simian Army suite of tools from Netflix that we’ve used to run experiments to test the resilience of production infrastructure. Security Chaos Engineering broadens the scope of this technique to the realm of security. We deliberately introduce false positives into production networks and other infrastructure — build-time dependencies, for example — to check whether procedures in place are capable of identifying security failures under controlled conditions. Although useful, this technique should be used with care to avoid desensitizing teams to security problems.

发布于 : May 15, 2018
Radar

下载第26期技术雷达

English | Español | Português | 中文

Radar

获取最新技术洞见

 

立即订阅

查看存档并阅读往期内容