Enable javascript in your browser for better experience. Need to know to enable it? Go here.
本页面中的信息并不完全以您的首选语言展示,我们正在完善其他语言版本。想要以您的首选语言了解相关信息,可以点击这里下载PDF。
更新于 : May 15, 2018
不在本期内容中
这一条目不在当前版本的技术雷达中。如果它出现在最近几期中,那么它很有可能仍然具有相关参考价值。如果这一条目出现在更早的雷达中,那么它很有可能已经不再具有相关性,我们的评估将不再适用于当下。很遗憾我们没有足够的带宽来持续评估以往的雷达内容。 了解更多
May 2018
评估 ? 在了解它将对你的企业产生什么影响的前提下值得探索

Our first rule of thumb in selecting a rules engine is normally: you don't need a rules engine. We've seen too many people tying themselves to a hard-to-test black-box rules engine for spurious reasons, when custom code would have been a better solution. That said, we've had success using Clara rules for scenarios where a rules engine does make sense. We like that it uses simple Clojure code to express and evaluate the rules, which means they are amenable to refactoring, testing and source control. Rather than chasing the illusion that business people should directly manipulate the rules, it drives collaboration between the business experts and developers.

Nov 2017
评估 ? 在了解它将对你的企业产生什么影响的前提下值得探索

Our first rule of thumb in selecting a rules engine is normally: you don't need a rules engine. We've seen too many people tying themselves to a hard-to-test black-box rules engine for spurious reasons, when custom code would have been a better solution. That said, we've had success using Clara rules for scenarios where a rules engine does make sense. We like that it uses simple Clojure code to express and evaluate the rules, which means they are amenable to refactoring, testing and source control. Rather than chasing the illusion that business people should directly manipulate the rules, it drives collaboration between the business experts and developers.

发布于 : Nov 30, 2017

下载第27期技术雷达

English | Español | Português | 中文

获取最新技术洞见

 

立即订阅

查看存档并阅读往期内容