As informações desta página não estão completamente disponíveis no seu idioma de escolha. Esperamos disponibiliza-las integralmente em outros idiomas em breve. Para ter acesso às informações no idioma de sua preferência, faça o download do PDF aqui.
Linguagens & Frameworks
Physical Web
NOT ON THE CURRENT EDITION
This blip is not on the current edition of the Radar. If it was on one of the last few editions it is likely that it is still relevant. If the blip is older it might no longer be relevant and our assessment might be different today. Unfortunately, we simply don't have the bandwidth to continuously review blips from previous editions of the RadarUnderstand more
Published: Nov 07, 2016
Last Updated: Mar 29, 2017
Mar 2017
Avalie
We have been intrigued by the Physical Web standard created by Google. The idea of Physical Web is simple—beacons broadcast a URL—but the possibilities are broad. Basically, this is a way to annotate the physical world, tying objects and locations into the digital realm. The current transport mechanism is Eddystone URLs over Bluetooth LE, and sample clients are available. Although there are obvious security concerns with following randomly discovered links, we are most interested in use cases with customized clients where you can filter or proxy the URLs as required.
Nov 2016
Avalie
We have been intrigued by the Physical Web standard created by Google. The idea of Physical Web is simple—beacons broadcast a URL—but the possibilities are broad. Basically, this is a way to annotate the physical world, tying objects and locations into the digital realm. The current transport mechanism is Eddystone URLs over Bluetooth LE, and sample clients are available. Although there are obvious security concerns with following randomly discovered links, we are most interested in use cases with customized clients where you can filter or proxy the URLs as required.