Enable javascript in your browser for better experience. Need to know to enable it? Go here.
Published : Oct 28, 2020
This blip is not on the current edition of the Radar. If it was on one of the last few editions, it is likely that it is still relevant. If the blip is older, it might no longer be relevant and our assessment might be different today. Unfortunately, we simply don't have the bandwidth to continuously review blips from previous editions of the Radar. Understand more
Oct 2020
Hold ? Proceed with caution

Since we originally introduced the term in 2016, micro frontends have grown in popularity and achieved mainstream acceptance. But like any new technique with an easy-to-remember name, it has occasionally been misused and abused. Particularly concerning is the tendency to use this architecture as an excuse to mix a range of competing technologies, tools or frameworks in a single page, leading to micro frontend anarchy. A particularly egregious form of this syndrome is using multiple frontend frameworks — for example, React.js and Angular — in the same "single-page" application. Although this might be technically possible, it is far from advisable when not part of a deliberate transition strategy. Other properties that should be consistent from team to team include the styling technique (e.g., CSS-in-JS or CSS modules) and the means by which the individual components are integrated (e.g., iFrames or web components). Furthermore, organizations should decide whether to standardize on consistent approaches or to leave it up to their teams to decide on state management, data fetching, build tooling, analytics and a host of other choices in a micro frontend application.

Download Technology Radar Volume 28

English | Español | Português | 中文

Stay informed about technology


Subscribe now

Visit our archive to read previous volumes