Master
ThoughtWorks
菜单
关闭
  • 产品及服务
    • 概况
    • 客户体验与产品设计业务线
    • 数据战略、工程及分析业务线
    • 数字化转型及运营业务线
    • 现代化企业、平台及云业务线
  • 合作伙伴
    • 概况
    • 汽车企业
    • 医疗企业
    • 公共服务机构
    • 清洁技术,能源与公用事业
    • 媒体和出版业
    • 零售业和电商
    • 金融和保险企业
    • 非盈利性组织
    • 旅游业和运输业
  • 洞见
    • 概况
    • 特色

      • 技术

        深入探索企业技术与卓越工程管理

      • 商业

        及时了解数字领导者的最新业务和行业见解

      • 文化

        分享职业发展心得,以及我们对社会公正和包容性的见解

    • 数字出版物和工具

      • 技术雷达

        对前沿技术提供意见和指引

      • 视野

        服务数字读者的出版物

      • 数字化流畅度模型

        可以将应对不确定性所需的数字能力进行优先级划分的模型

      • 解码器

        业务主管的A-Z技术指南

    • 所有洞见

      • 文章

        助力商业的专业洞见

      • 博客

        ThoughtWorks 全球员工的洞见及观点

      • 书籍

        浏览更多我们的书籍

      • 播客

        分析商业和技术最新趋势的精彩对话

  • 加入我们
    • 概况
    • 申请流程

      面试准备

    • 毕业生和变换职业者

      正确开启技术生涯

    • 搜索工作

      在您所在的区域寻找正在招聘的岗位

    • 保持联系

      订阅我们的月度新闻简报

  • 关于我们
    • 概况
    • 我们的宗旨
    • 奖项与荣誉
    • 多元与包容
    • 领导层
    • 合作伙伴
    • 辅助功能
    • 新闻
  • 联系我们
China | 中文
  • United States United States
    English
  • China China
    中文 | English
  • India India
    English
  • Canada Canada
    English
  • Singapore Singapore
    English
  • United Kingdom United Kingdom
    English
  • Australia Australia
    English
  • Germany Germany
    English | Deutsch
  • Brazil Brazil
    English | Português
  • Spain Spain
    English | Español
  • Global Global
    English
博客
选择主题
查看所有话题关闭
技术 
敏捷项目管理 云 持续交付 数据科学与工程 捍卫网络自由 演进式架构 体验设计 物联网 语言、工具与框架 遗留资产现代化 Machine Learning & Artificial Intelligence 微服务 平台 安全 软件测试 技术策略 
商业 
金融服务 全球医疗 创新 零售行业 转型 
招聘 
职业心得 多元与融合 社会改变 
博客

话题

选择主题
  • 技术
    技术
  • 技术 概观
  • 敏捷项目管理
  • 云
  • 持续交付
  • 数据科学与工程
  • 捍卫网络自由
  • 演进式架构
  • 体验设计
  • 物联网
  • 语言、工具与框架
  • 遗留资产现代化
  • Machine Learning & Artificial Intelligence
  • 微服务
  • 平台
  • 安全
  • 软件测试
  • 技术策略
  • 商业
    商业
  • 商业 概观
  • 金融服务
  • 全球医疗
  • 创新
  • 零售行业
  • 转型
  • 招聘
    招聘
  • 招聘 概观
  • 职业心得
  • 多元与融合
  • 社会改变
转型Bangalore商业

Transforming for real

Sriram Narayan Sriram Narayan

Published: Feb 1, 2018

Global In-House centers (GICs) are near-shore or offshore based wholly owned subsidiaries of big, old-guard, businesses, typically headquartered in the US and Europe (or the global north). They typically support knowledge-intensive processes, back office, and IT operations. The GIC phenomenon began on the basis of labor arbitrage and grew on the back of talent quality and availability, primarily in India and China but also in Romania, the Philippines, and Ireland. On the other hand, the business environment has changed significantly since the time GICs were conceived at parent headquarters.


The winds of change

The last ten years has been about these businesses waking up to the reality of software eating the world via tech platforms, AI algorithms, and mobile apps that eliminate friction in everyday transactions and put buyers in charge, relative to sellers, if not to the platforms.



However, only a few of these businesses have realized that irrespective of the industry they are in, they now need to learn new ways of working from leading tech companies if they are to retain and grow market share.

“We came to the realization that, ultimately, we are a technology company operating in the financial-services business. So we asked ourselves where we could learn about being a best-in-class technology company. The answer was not other banks, but real tech firms.”
- Peter Jacobs, CIO, ING Netherlands


These 'early followers' have re-organized to integrate strategic parts of their tech organization closely with the business. They have reviewed what they outsource and even in-sourced product development in key areas. They have moved away, at least partly, from big upfront plans to a culture of continuous experimentation, iteration, and learning.

“...All of this is grounded in our strategy, which is the recognition that the winners in banking are going to be companies that ultimately look like great technology companies because that is where the industry of banking is going.”
- Rob Alexander, CIO, Capital One


GICs haven’t participated enough in this sort of change although they have evolved in their own way. The scale of GIC operations has multiplied, and their functions have grown to include innovation and data analytics centers. Some innovation centers focus on developing proof-of-concept solutions, while others focus on building IP through patents. Do their efforts regularly make a difference to parent business outcomes? That remains to be seen.

Stuck in delivery

Most single and multi-function GICs build and operate software for their parent businesses. They do it as part of market-facing product and platform development efforts, digital-age IT programs, or internal application development and support. However, the role of a GIC is still mostly restricted to delivery of a solution conceived close to global north markets. Earlier stages of the value stream such as problem selection, problem analysis, business case development, and solution definition are still mostly performed in the parent organization and are handed over to the GIC for efficient and reliable delivery after a two-day hothouse.

Such a downstream-only role for a GIC is somewhat understandable given their distance - geographic, cultural, and contextual - from the markets. However, this sort of big-batch, non-iterative progression through the development value stream regularly misses the mark in terms of business benefits realized and jeopardizes business results. Considering the vital role of software for business success in the digital age, there is significant opportunity to increase GICs’ span of responsibility with respect to software development.

On the other hand, some stakeholders in parent organizations would argue that GICs’ need to get better at solution delivery before aiming for greater participation or responsibility. The argument isn’t without merit. Even in 2017, software development in GICs is largely supervised by old-school managers and so-called Scrum masters who coerce developers into committing to estimates based on woefully inadequate information and then micromanage teams into meeting those estimates. Considerations of building the right thing and building the thing right take a backseat in the process.

In these setups, the number of people who track value is usually disproportionate to the number of people who add value—quite a contrast to the digital-age operating models powering the best organizations today.

What digital success demands

In response to feedback from business and diktats from above, several GICs have embarked on large-scale agile and DevOps adoption programs. They have had limited effect because changes on the ground have been somewhat cosmetic. For example, delivery dashboards report fantastic test coverage, but it turns out to be meaningless on closer inspection because the tests have no assertions.

DevOps really requires a merger of the change and run organizations into a single hierarchy. Leadership roles such as VP-Development and VP-Operations come under review. This is hard as compared to adopting DevOps tools for application release automation which is what ends up passing for DevOps in many places.

Organizations that flourish in the digital economy will be the ones that learn to operate differently. They will be able to exploit short-lived opportunities by adopting an operating model geared for responsiveness over cost-efficiency. Although all organizations will face the pressure to make the transition, only some will succeed.

Among other things, it will require a blurring of organizational boundaries between business, digital, product, and IT. It will also require a change in management and governance culture. Therefore, it is going to need leadership by courageous executives to sponsor the kind of invasive surgery required to become a fighting fit GIC adapted to the digital age.

How do courageous executives lead a transformation? They don’t merely provide executive sponsorship from the top floor. They step in to provide courage and direction for difficult decisions. Unless they provide active support, their deputies will seek out non-existent, proven approaches in the form industry-peer case-studies for everything that feels like a change. Who wants to take risks if the boss isn’t standing shoulder to shoulder?

That’s why many so-called transformations are mostly a re-branding of old ways of thinking and working. In the absence of real change, fatigue sets in among the troops as each new wave of not-so-courageous executives, lacking the stomach for invasive surgery, sponsor yet another ceremonial transformation.

'Invasive surgery' is used as an alternative to the overused term 'transformation' in the expectation that it provides a striking metaphor for changes such as: governing for value over predictability, redrawing organizational boundaries to avoid silos inside critical value streams, designing non-counterproductive KPIs, and moving away from project-based funding and execution. Are GICs ready for it?

相关博客
转型

Seven Pitfalls to Avoid During Organizational Transformation

Anupam Kundu
Tarang Baxi
了解更多
转型

Do You Have What It Takes To Transform?

Gary O'Brien
了解更多
创新

Pioneering Organizational Transformation: Here's What You Need to Know

Sue Visic
了解更多
Master
政策声明 | 现代奴役声明 | 辅助功能
Connect with us
×

WeChat

QR code to ThoughtWorks China WeChat subscription account
© 2021 ThoughtWorks, Inc.